Shouldn't Taunt have "if valid target" on it?

Discussion in 'Feedback and Suggestions' started by Dorque, Jan 30, 2013.

  1. Dorque

    Dorque Orc Soldier

    Taunting someone at max range and standing behind a tree is the most powerful card in the game. If I don't have LoS to the Taunter I should be allowed to target someone else, because omg. "Lose two turns, range 10."
     
  2. Hallas

    Hallas Mushroom Warrior

    The character standing behind the tree is also losing two turns of being out in the open. There are advantages and disadvantages to it. Plus, the character being taunted can still use attack cards that aren't target-based.
     
  3. Kaerius

    Kaerius Orc Soldier

    I've been on the recieving end of taunt. I killed the taunter. It wouldn't let me attack anyone else for 2 turns anyway because my only valid target was DEAD.
     
  4. Wozarg

    Wozarg Thaumaturge

    I have to say that the card should work as written or the point of using it is almost none existent since i will just get out of LoS from the taunter but retain LoS to the guy i want to attack making the card mildly annoying at best.
     
  5. Jon

    Jon Blue Manchu Staff Member

    Huh, that's a bug and I'll note it.
     
  6. Arnifix

    Arnifix Kobold

    Just noting that killing the taunter still leaves the taunt effect on the targetted character, leaving them effectively useless for two turns. Frustrating!
     

Share This Page