I've seen it happen so many times it's just stupid now. Parry's failing 1/2 times instead of 1/6, armour ALWAYS failing i could go on... Maybe i'm just extremely unlucky.
I missed 2 parries and 5 HtPD against the rust creatures. I ditched my warriors for wizards after that.
Sorry gents, this is was a bit of a rant. To clarify, I 100% believe the devs have adjusted the probability on some of the campaign maps to favour the GM. Watching your 8/9 of your parries fail over two attempts at the same module would also convince you of this. I initially thought this on my first play through but put it down to bad luck or bias on my behalf but am convinced the GM has a slight advantage on all the campaign maps.
This is not true, but I understand the frustration of feeling like the game is set up in a certain way when RNG runs foul. https://forums.cardhunter.com/threads/enemy-rolls-seem-anything-but-random.727/page-2#post-8747 So unless Jon is blatantly lying (which I seriously doubt...), there's no cheating implemented.
Yeah I remember that thread from a while back, I do understand what has been stated. Maybe I have bias in remembering, although the worst I've seen in MP is an opponent failing three parries in a row. Where as I've failed virtually 8 in a row in campaign... I will now always feel the GM's are like a casino.... House always wins
Eight in a row is atrociously bad - but on the other hand, if no one ever complained about bad rolls it would be a poor RNG. (What I mean by that is real life random will randomly get streaks in numbers, if there were never streaks of ones, then it would actually be less like a real random.)