So I've been thinking lately that league matches should count just like ranked matches as far as guild ratings go. Mostly because I'm fairly sure I do better in leagues than I do in ranked, but also because it seems fair. Everyone is on the same footing they would be in ranked (either because you are using your constructed decks or the same fixed decks of the league), so I don't see why they SHOULDN'T count. I'd like to hear the community's thoughts on the matter. Also, is there any way to keep track of your league wins/losses on the meta? I haven't seen one, but I think it would be pretty cool if there were. Then I would KNOW I was better at leagues instead of just suspecting that was the case. @Farbs ?
No, but in the game you can see how you did in every league you've ever played and compare that to Meta's summary of your ranked games.
Nope! It's an interesting idea though, and I certainly gave it some thought. The thing is, league matchmaking doesn't consider your rating so highly rated players tend to do much better in leagues than in ranked play. If guild rating was affected by both that would disincentivise ranked play, which I really don't want to do.
