[Feedback] Whirlwind ruins most games

Discussion in 'Feedback and Suggestions' started by Pazuzu, Aug 11, 2013.

  1. Pazuzu

    Pazuzu Mushroom Warrior

    I think this card (both all and enemy) ruins this game. It's a game of position and you have to think about it, doing your calculations etc, then a simple card messes up everything. This is worst than an icy card, that can be avoid in various manners. It's simply lame.
     
    Platouf likes this.
  2. Pengw1n

    Pengw1n Moderately Informed Staff Member

    Whirlwind can be avoided by blocks, and Immovable et c. It used to dominate early PvP - but then it seems it got bypassed by step builds, then encumber ones et c. I think it's probably fine in terms of balance tbh.

    Part of the game is maintaning your position, and stop the enemy from messing with you, so only gamebreaker if you don't want to bother preparing for it.
     
  3. Unlucky Scarecrow

    Unlucky Scarecrow Goblin Champion

    It's a high risk solution for creating distance between two or more characters. It's a perfectly reasonable option, if the caster is willing to accept the possible consequences, such as; Not actually putting any distance between the characters you wanted to, moving yourself away from victory points, moving your opponent towards victory points, putting yourself in harmful or terrain, ruining line of sight for your remaining spells. Whirlwind Enemies only marginally better, because it still has a lot of potential drawbacks but at the very least you know you won't be flinging yourself onto lava tiles.
     
  4. Blindsight

    Blindsight Ogre

    I also have an issue with them due to the totally anti-tactical nature of them.

    I've found that if you plan for Whirlwind Enemies you can never get a horrible result. When you hold the victory conditions and are running any encumber spells this becomes a very game changing card. It seems as though that, when planning for it, there are only two situations that can result. The first is a neutral result that doesn't really mean too much to the game -- such as when the enemy position doesn't change by any reasonable margin. The second is that you gain an advantage either by bringing one of their characters in range of all three of yours, or moving their characters away from/off of the victory conditions usually assuring your team of one or more victory points.

    Similar to the firestorm argument, WWE is a global spell that when your strategy is focused around it, you only need to draw the cards you need with very minor attention paid to positioning. So long as your party is grouped together, has additional movement and is ready to attack, WWE can, at worst, do nothing for you or at best allow you to take out one or more of their characters.

    Normal Whirlwind is a bit of a different story because you can't plan for it quite as well. My problem with it is that it reduces the game to random chance instead of strategy -- which, yes, I'm aware that this can BE a strategy, but not something that supports skilled play.

    Here is my current party that has been serving me well (a little too well in my opinion). I'm certain others can find a better setup to punish people with this tactic. I have lost with it only due to my opponent casting WWE before I drew mine; not drawing WWE at all; and/or not drawing attacks for 2 rounds when already in the center of the board...

    Oh, and I often beat Mom without even playing an attack.

    Gor
    Level 11 Dwarf Warrior

    Ar'snick
    Level 1 Dwarf Wizard

    Gam
    Level 18 Dwarf Warrior
     
    Forlorn likes this.
  5. Keyser

    Keyser Goblin Champion

    I totally understand complaints that WW is too random and annoying. But I have trouble seeing it as OP. You totally disrupt the tactical situation, and give your opponent first move to take advantage of any opportunities that have opened up. Far too often, it's a recipe for disaster.

    I'd be curious how many people with ratings over 1400 or so have it in their decks, and how often they use it. I have to say I don't run into it all that often in highly ranked games.
     
  6. Blindsight

    Blindsight Ogre


    As far as just Whirlwind it's very hit or miss. That's really part of the problem. There's not solid tactic with it. At best it's a panic button. It's not that it's OP (like some might consider WWE) but that it ruins games. I've often had the caster use it, then immediately quit because it was bad, or immediately win by being able to drop two characters in the next round. Either way, it doesn't make for a good game.
     
  7. Generica

    Generica Mushroom Warrior

    In MP Whirlwind and Whirlwind Enemies are pretty high up on the list of anti-fun cards. Just like Volcano it encourages strategies of delay, avoidance and baiting out your opponents' move cards so you can get an advantage from being more prepared for the nasty surprise than they are. Whether or not these cards are OP they should not be as available as they are because it's a borderline cheese strategy and the only counter is to play as passively and protectively of your move cards as your opponent is (to be constantly prepared for cheese).

    The card quality and token cost for disruptive global spells like these three needs to be higher. WWE is so cheap to get in your decks - cheaper in many cases than the blocks it burns - that including blocks, team moves and immovables specifically against it will put your opponent at a token advantage. And he'll still get to move one or two of your characters.
     
  8. Blindsight

    Blindsight Ogre

    I think that would be a good change for them, allowing them, but not allowing the ability to have so many of them.

    I've found some Tempest Robes to put on my Wizard which brings my whirlwind count to 3 (I could do without those though!) and my WWE count to 7.
     
  9. Buncs

    Buncs Kobold

    What if it were to be changed to an extended maze effect then? For instance move each character 5 random directions, or even better have a 5x5 grid that they can be randomly put on (obviously other distances would work too)
     
  10. Wozarg

    Wozarg Thaumaturge

    i honestly think whirlwind is fine there are cards to counter it and it as people have said highly random and more of a last resort kind of deal. If you still feel its too hard to beat either run more dwarfs that can't be moved or more elfs that don't care as much as they will catch up quickly anyway.
     
  11. dmar314

    dmar314 Goblin Champion


    I like this idea a lot. It would be much less random feeling that placing anywhere on the board but still feel flavorful enough to be "whirlwind"-like. Although whirlwind in its current state doesn't bother me that much, it just makes movement cards more valuable. Besides, baiting out opponent move cards before whirlwind or lava terrain has always made for interesting mind games.
     
  12. Blindsight

    Blindsight Ogre


    This doesn't change the fact that in order to play against it well you need to play a slow cautious game. Unless you have all of your immobile's on, you have to hold at least one movement card. Even if you do it may not be enough to get you out of trouble.

    Again WW isn't as much of a problem as WWE is in this respect, but certainly still an issue.
     
  13. Logan Hawkthorne

    Logan Hawkthorne Mushroom Warrior

    I used to like WWE, but then I got annoyed by how random it is, so I replaced them with Winds of Wars and Telekinesis-es and I got so much more satisfied with the result.
     
  14. Forlorn

    Forlorn Orc Soldier

    Funny how I missed this thread. I made my own "I hate whirlwind cards" thread here: http://forums.cardhunter.com/threads/whirlwind-isnt-fun-and-adds-too-much-luck-to-the-game.3067/

    It's not that whirlwind is OP, it's that it's lame and not fun.

     
  15. Logan Hawkthorne

    Logan Hawkthorne Mushroom Warrior

    Oh yes, absolutely! That is why I loved Whirlwind Enemies at lower ranks. Not because I thought the effect was so powerful (although it was good), but because it won me a lot of matches due to ragequit. I was so grateful for such cards, they could win me a game even from a very bad position due to frustrated ragequit, "regular" players just saw it and gave up immediately, regardless of actual winning chances. Ha Ha Ha!
    Too bad this does not work against more experienced players at higher ranks any more!
     
  16. Forlorn

    Forlorn Orc Soldier


    Yes, but after enough time you wouldn't have any opponents to play against. Think of how bad a card like WWE is for the game's longevity.
     
  17. Logan Hawkthorne

    Logan Hawkthorne Mushroom Warrior

    I think if a player is a type of player who gets frustrated when something bad happens to his team, he would always find something to complain about. This is not how good players are born. Good players are born in the fires of Lava Traps and the winds of WWE and the cold hell of Encumberance. Man up, deal with it, learn from it! Oh I'd love to be a drill sergeant.

    Anyway I am not really defending WWE, perhaps getting rid of it would indeed be good for the game, i honestly don't know. I really like the card art tho, so I'd be sad to see it go.
     
    Banezilla likes this.
  18. Forlorn

    Forlorn Orc Soldier


    There is such a large difference between WWE, a card with infinite range and 100% luck, versus every other card in the game that it's difficult to take this sentence seriously:

    Sorry man, there is nothing good about a card with 100% luck. There is no skill involved. That is not "good" by any definition.

    By the way - since we're on the topic of good players - what is your elo? My rank floats around the top 50 player mark. You make it sound like I'm whining when in fact I'm probably a much better player than you. Not trying to insult you, just trying to keep it real.
     
  19. Logan Hawkthorne

    Logan Hawkthorne Mushroom Warrior

    nah don't take it personally, I just really try to sound like Melvin, he's my hero.

    What I'm trying to say is, that such a random card usually gets less used (in the world of CCGs) the more experienced a player is, because they prefer reliability.
    What I don't get is, if you think it is such a good card, and don't want to come across as whiny, why don't you use it yourself and tell us stories about how well it worked for you instead of against you.
     
  20. skip_intro

    skip_intro Ogre

    Any card with a dice roll on it uses luck. By your definition none of those cards are "good".

    Well, it comes across as an insult / e-peen measuring contest. Your MP rank is better than mine, but that just means you've won more MP matches, not that you're a "better" player than me.
     

Share This Page